Applications are reviewed on the basis of agency-wide criteria of artistic excellence and artistic merit.
The following are considered during the review of applications:
The artistic excellence of the project, which includes the:
- Quality of the artists, arts or design professionals, arts organizations, works of art, or services that the project will involve, as appropriate for the community in which the project takes place.
Artistic excellence is evaluated based on the material and work samples submitted with the application. This includes a description of the process and criteria for the selection of artists, design professionals, arts organizations, works of art, or services to ensure artistic excellence; and work samples of selected or proposed artists, design professionals, arts organizations, works of art, or services that demonstrate artistic excellence. See "How to Prepare and Submit an Application" for the material and work samples that are required to ensure and demonstrate artistic excellence.
The artistic merit of the project, which includes the following:
- Strength of the proposed partnership, including the required partners, and engagement of the private and public sectors in support of the project.
- Appropriateness of the project to the partners’ missions and the community in which the project will take place.
- Ability to carry out the project based on such factors as the
- Appropriateness of the budget, its feasibility, level of community support, and strategy for maintaining the work of the project.
- Likelihood that the project will be completed within the proposed period of support.
- Quality and clarity of the project goals and design.
- Resources involved.
- Qualifications of the project's personnel.
- Readiness to meet requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act and/or the National Historic Preservation Act, where relevant.
- Extent to which the project engages the public in planning for and participating in the project.
- Where appropriate, potential to reach underserved populations such as those whose opportunities to experience the arts are limited by geography, ethnicity, economics, or disability.
- Appropriateness of the proposed performance measurements and their ability to demonstrate that the NEA Livability outcome was achieved, including, as appropriate, plans for documentation and evaluation of the overall project results.
What Happens to Your Application
All applications are reviewed according to the review criteria by an advisory panel comprised of qualified peer experts, including at least one knowledgeable layperson, representing a range of multidisciplinary art, design, and economic and community development fields. Panel recommendations are forwarded to the National Council on the Arts, which then makes recommendations to the Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts. The Chairman reviews the Council’s recommendations and makes the final decision on all grant awards. Pending the availability of funding, it is anticipated that applicants will be notified of award or rejection in July 2013.
National Endowment for the Arts · an independent federal agency
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20506
Director's Welcome (video)
Our Town Communities
Our Town Webinars
NEA ARTS Magazine on
Creative Placemaking (pdf)
2011 & 2012 grants (by state)
2011 & 2012 grants (by type)
Sample Application Narratives